I would like to start my tirade by saying that obviously I will never be seen in public in jeggings, Wal-Mart or not. The only time I wear leggings of any sort is (a) under my big-old-lady jeans because it's freezing and my flab is no longer sufficient to warm me, (b) as part of a pajama outfit that consists of leggings and a faded and stretched-beyond-recognition t-shirt, (c) when I have lost all of the good sense the Lord gave me, or (d) I am the last person on Earth. Naturally, since I will not be participating in this fashion trend, I really don't know why any one else would either. Oh - that's right - there are skinny chicks out there on whom these would look fabulous. My bad.
Anyhow, I can't help but wonder what other fashions will not be permitted to mate, resulting in even newer and more expensive fashion possibilities. How about:
- Shocks - why bother putting on socks AND shoes - these will get both in one fell swoop
- Shoves - gloves attached to the ends of your shirt - perfect for cold weather
- Branties - a one-piece, do-it-all undergarment from upper to lower
- Birts - for the messy eater - a bib on the top of your top
- Skirdle - for those ladies who have neglected those sit-ups and crunches
I could go on, but why bother? I am an old lady who is content with the basics - shirt, pants, coat - and have them plenty loose and flowing. I don't have the body for new-fangled clothing that's form fitting. I need fabric, and lots of it. In fact, maybe I'll just start my own fashion trend - the Lumu - it'll cover it all.
__________________________________________________________________
Things that make today great: BSC with Lindley and 2-mile stroll
4 comments:
I may or may not own jeggings.
Traitor!
I may or may not also own a pair ;-)
You people are going to be very sorry when I squeeze into a pair (or two or three) and show up in public!
Post a Comment